Watch our Clear on Deer film
Following its successful tour of selected venues around the UK, you can now watch our 30-minute film with Libby Penman (pictured) exploring issues around deer management Clear on Deer online. Clear on Deer
Deer management: FAQs
Why are Scotland's deer numbers too high, and why is this a problem? Why can't fencing be used instead of culling? Can immuno contraception help reduce deer numbers? Does fewer deer mean fewer jobs?
These questions, and more, answered in our comprehensive deer management FAQ resource.
The Scottish Government and deer management
In 2017, an independed Deer Working Group was established by the Scottish Government to review existing arrangements for the management of wild deer in Scotland.
In 2020, the group published a report that makes recommendations for changes to ensure effective deer management 'that safeguards public interests and promotes the sustainable management of wild deer.'
In 2021, the Scottish government accepted either in detail or in principle 91 of the 99 recommendations made, signalling a clear intention to bring about an historic transformation in the way Scotland’s deer population is managed.
In December 2022, the Scottish Government published its Biodiversity Strategy to 2045, setting out a clear ambition for Scotland to be Nature Positive by 2030, and to have restored and regenerated biodiversity across the country by 2045. Driving down and delivering 'substantially reduced deer densities across our landscapes' is listed as a priority action.
Deer management in Assynt
Since the start of 2023, the John Muir Trust has come under some fierce criticism in north west Scotland following our successful application for an out-of-season and night licence to step up our deer cull on the Quinag estate. This is necessary to meet our ecological objectives here.
This resource offers some context, data and rationale behind this decision.
Deer and communities
We should make it clear that the John Muir Trust has never opposed deer stalking.
In Assynt we recently funded and constructed a community deer larder at Glencanisp. We work with Ullapool High School on an annual ‘Hill to Grill’ programme to educate school students in the entire process of producing venison from the hillside to the dinner plate. We initiated a local women’s stalking group.
We are clear that our environmental objectives can co-exist side-by side with sport shooting on other estates with no threat whatsoever to other people’s livelihoods.
Wolf, lynx and re-introductions
The term ‘rewilding’ was first coined in 1990 and has come into prominence in recent years. It has no standard definition but is generally used to describe an approach to nature conservation and ecological restoration that focuses on advancing a richer and wilder environment for the benefit of nature and people - a mission closely aligned with our own.
"Rewilding" however can be a problematic term, and one the Trust doesn't tend to use. The 're' prefix can, for many, speak to the idea of getting a place back to an historic state of being. But what baseline state of being is the right one - 50 years ago? 100? Environmental, political, and societal contexts have changed since then, and the John Muir Trust believes in an approach that allows nature the freedom to adapt to current circumstances in the best way it sees fit. The current state of wild places in the UK means that human intervention is necessary to give nature this freedom; to help restore a balance that humans have tipped off kilter (such as high deer numbers, or invasive plant species that drown out native flora).
The reintroduction of large predators such as lynx and wolves is often part of the rewildling conversation. Lynx and wolves would indeed have an impact on deer numbers in Scotland. However, it would only be possible to bring back these species with national public and political support and, crucially, with community support in the relevant local and regional areas. Even then, reintroductions would need to be phased in over a prolonged period of time, and therefore would not be sufficient on their own to reduce Scotland’s deer numbers to sustainable levels. At least in the short-to-medium term, human management of deer would still be essential.